A letter by U.S. lawmaker Zohran Mamdani expressing solidarity with jailed Indian activist Umar Khalid has sparked strong backlash from Hindu extremist groups, highlighting the growing international reach of India’s domestic political disputes.
Mamdani, a member of the New York State Assembly, wrote publicly in support of Khalid, who has been in custody since 2020 under India’s Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Khalid was arrested in connection with protests against India’s Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), legislation that critics say discriminates against Muslims.

In his letter, Mamdani raised concerns over Khalid’s prolonged detention without trial and framed the case as a matter of civil liberties, freedom of speech, and democratic rights. The statement circulated widely on social media, drawing praise from rights advocates and sharp condemnation from Hindu nationalist organizations.

Backlash and Accusations
Hindu extremist groups and affiliated commentators accused Mamdani of interfering in India’s internal affairs and of defending an individual they describe as “anti-national.” Online campaigns targeting the U.S. lawmaker followed, with calls for retractions and personal attacks gaining traction across social media platforms.
The reaction was amplified by diaspora networks, where nationalist groups framed the letter as part of what they see as increasing foreign criticism of India’s political and legal system.

Symbolism of Umar Khalid
Umar Khalid remains a deeply polarizing figure in India. Supporters describe him as a political prisoner detained for dissent, while Hindu extremist groups view him as emblematic of opposition to Hindu majoritarian ideology. His detention has become a focal point in wider debates over nationalism, minority rights, and freedom of expression.

Broader Context
Analysts say the episode underscores how ideological conflicts rooted in India’s politics are increasingly playing out on a global stage, particularly through diaspora activism and social media amplification.
The controversy also highlights the risks faced by international politicians who speak out on human rights cases beyond their own borders. Mamdani has not publicly retracted his remarks.